Physicians are responsible for performing abortions in our state. Your editorial "A Senate snag on women's rights?" (Feb. 3) did not mention that the Reproductive Health Act would downgrade this standard and allow abortions to be performed by an undefined "qualified, licensed health care practitioner."
How does this downgrade to non-physicians protect women?
The bill would permit abortion even in late pregnancy to protect the life or health of the mother. In abortion-speak, the word "health" is interpreted so broadly that it's difficult to think what it would not include. How does this protect the state's legitimate interest in protecting unborn human life?
The bill would establish a "fundamental right" to abortion in our state. Because of this change, the right of parents to be involved in the abortion decisions of their minor daughters could never be guaranteed.
Likewise, any common sense measure taken to provide women with the information they need to make an informed decision about their pregnancy might be considered discriminatory.
How does this expand equality?
We don't need this dangerous bill.
Kathleen De Mers
Schenectady