Quantcast
Channel: Opinion Articles
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 15803

A ban on polystyrene foam makes environmental sense

$
0
0

The following is from an editorial in The New York Times:

Every year, New York City residents throw away about 20,000 tons of plastic foam containers or, worse, the peanut-shaped packaging filler that sticks to anything in its path. Polystyrene foam is a plague on the environment. It is brittle. It breaks into pieces — sometimes very tiny pieces — that are devilishly hard to pick up. And there is no easy or cheap way to recycle it. Officials are considering a ban on foam containers and loose packaging. They should make it happen as soon as possible.

As now written, the council's prohibition would take effect in July 2015 unless the polystyrene industry found a safe, practical and inexpensive way to recycle the product by Jan. 1, 2015. Industry says it can, although at this point it is hard to imagine how such a plan would work.

Thomas Outerbridge, general manager of the company building New York City's most advanced recycling plant, in Brooklyn, told city officials in June that his new facility would not be able to recycle polystyrene foam products. They would go straight into the regular garbage, he said. In San Jose, Calif., one of many West Coast cities to ban the containers, the city's website explains that the low market value and the high rate of contamination by food "makes it impossible to recycle" these products.

Many companies already have ditched the foam clamshell for less harmful alternatives, like paper or recyclable plastic. In September, for example, McDonald's announced plans to replace polystyrene cups at its 14,000 restaurants with paper cups. New York City should be next.

As Mayor Michael Bloomberg said when he proposed the prohibition on polystyrene foam earlier this year, "We can live without it, we may live longer without it, and the doggy bag will survive just fine."


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 15803

Trending Articles